Troll or just that stupid?

I really can't decide if the guy that posted this is trying to be a deliberate troll, or if he's really that insanely stupid.

Grizzly's are not big soft "Teddy Bears" To me they are basically large, dangerous rodents that can eat you alive. They have no useful purpose,except as target practice. Mankind already is responsible for over 100 various animal extinctions. Brown bears are long overdue. They all need to be hunted down and wiped out. Maybe have a few in the zoo's.

Though it does remind me of a group that angie_di told me about in a book she was reading...called themselves the Extinctionists, anything that couldn't justify its existence they tried very hard to wipe out. They were about as bright as this guy(its a fiction book)

Amusing statements

I was debating renting a longer lens for the Road Lottery, and was looking though lensrentals.com since rentglass.com appears to be perpetually out of stock of EVERYTHING Nikon.

I was thinking about getting a 70-200mm f/2.8 and a TC-14E II teleconverter to go with it(takes it out to 280mm and F/4 or so) and on the bottom of the page for the TC-14E II I read the following comment by the company.

Please folks: If the lens you want to use this with isn’t listed above, don’t order it. It doesn’t work with the 80-400. It has never worked with the 80-400. Its not going to work with the 80-400 when you try it. Nor (I swear its happened) will it work well with a 12-24.

I started laughing at this. I can see someone really hoping it might work on the 80-400, but why on EARTH would you try and use a teleconverter on a 14-24? The thing is a specialty lens and I can't imagine ANYONE that has just a 14-24 and nothing else that could cover the 24-40mm range you'd get. There are probably a half a dozen lenses that cover this range, and most of them are less expensive than the TC-14 is.